DiffECG: Diffusion Model-Powered Label-Efficient and Personalized Arrhythmia Diagnosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arrhythmia diagnosis using electrocardiogram (ECG) is critical for preventing cardiovascular risks. However, existing deep learning-based methods struggle with label scarcity and contrastive learning-based methods suffer from false-negative samples, which lead to poor model generalization. Besides, due to inter-subject variability, pre-trained models cannot achieve evenly performance across individuals. Conducting model fine-tuning for each individual is computationally expensive and does not guarantee improvement. We propose DiffECG, a diffusion-based self-supervised learning framework for label-efficient and personalized arrhythmia detection. Our method utilizes a diffusion model to extract robust ECG representations, coupled with a novel feature extractor and a multi-modal feature fusion strategy to obtain a well-generalized model. Moreover, we propose an efficient model personalization mechanism based on zeroth-order optimization. It personalizes the model by tuning the noise-adding step t in the diffusion process, significantly reducing computational costs compared to model fine-tuning. Experimental results show that our proposed method outperforms the SOTA method by 37.9% and 23.9% in generalization and personalization performance, respectively. The source code is available at: https://github.com/Auguuust/DiffEC
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".