DGL: Dynamic Global-Local Information Aggregation for Scalable VRP Generalization with Self-Improvement Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) is a critical combinatorial optimization problem with wide-reaching real-world applications, particularly in logistics, transportation. While neural network-based VRP solvers have shown impressive results on test instances similar to training data, their performance often degrades when faced with varying scales and unseen distributions, limiting their practical applicability. To overcome these limitations, we introduce DGL (Dynamic Global-Local Information Aggregation), a novel model that combines global and local information to effectively solve VRPs. DGL dynamically adjusts local node selections within a localized range, capturing local invariance across problems of different scales and distributions, thereby enhancing generalization. At the same time, DGL integrates global context into the decision-making process, providing richer information for more informed decisions. Additionally, we propose a replacement-based self-improvement learning framework that leverages data augmentation and random replacement techniques, further enhancing DGL's robustness. Extensive experiments on synthetic datasets, benchmark datasets, and real-world country map instances demonstrate that DGL achieves state-of-the-art performance, particularly in generalizing to large-scale VRPs and real-world scenarios. These results showcase DGL's effectiveness in solving complex, realistic optimization challenges and highlight its potential for practical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".