Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le concept de conspiritualité (conspirituality), développé en 2011 par David Ward et Charlotte Voas, désigne l’intersection entre la spiritualité New Age dans son acception large, et les théories du complot. En définissant la conspiritualité comme une philosophie politico-spirituelle émergeant dans les années 1990 et fondée sur les principes selon lesquels rien n’arrive par hasard, rien n’est ce qu’il semble être, et tout est lié, Ward et Voas conceptualisent un champ articulant les théories du complot et la spiritualité. Ce champ tend à gagner en autonomie, notamment en ligne, depuis la pandémie de Covid-19. Bien que le texte initial de Ward et Voas ait suscité des critiques, tout en ouvrant la voie à un domaine d’investigation novateur et stimulant. Cet article discute cette notion tout en soulignant ses développements récents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it