Correlations between Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome and Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The focus of this article was to evaluate the link between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and periodontitis, considering various hypotheses supporting the relationship between respiratory disorders and periodontitis. The literature review for this study was performed using the PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, and Proquest databases. The review process was guided by the PRISMA guidelines. The PECOS protocol (Population, Exposure, Control, Outcome, Study) was followed in developing the search strategy to ensure consistent and accurate selection of articles. To evaluate quality, cross-sectional studies were reviewed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. Case-control studies were assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). The research included a total of 10 studies, encompassing 88,040 participants. The meta-analysis observed a statistically significant association between OSAS and periodontitis, with an odds ratio OR = 2.4620 (95%-CI: 1.7345–3.4946 p ≤ 0.0001). The results suggest a potential association between OSA and periodontitis. Further investigations are warranted to confirm this association and elucidate its underlying mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.015 | 0.025 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".