MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401030651 · doi:10.1353/tmj.2021.a932834

Mid-Nineteenth Century Weavings from Imerina, Madagascar: A Missionary’s Collection in Dialogue with Contemporaneous Malagasy Texts

2021· article· en· W4401030651 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Fee

Bibliographic record

VenueTextile Museum journal. · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryAncient historyAnthropologyGeographyEthnologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Numerous texts in many languages from medieval times praise the beautiful handwoven cloth of sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, very few pieces dating before 1870 survive in the subcontinent or in international museums. This is the case for the island nation of Madagascar, eastern Africa’s most active weaving center. Of great interest, therefore, are eleven textiles obtained by the British missionary William Ellis during his various visits to Madagascar from 1853 to 1865, which are today housed at the Royal Ontario Museum. This research note aims to put in dialogue the cloths acquired by Ellis with his writings and early photographs of the island, as well as important contemporaneous descriptions by Malagasy authors. Combining these sources reveals the cloths’ wider historical significance, local aesthetics, and techniques of manufacture. Some represent unique surviving examples of luxury types mentioned in historic literature, while others were hitherto known only from black-and-white images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTextile Museum journal.Same topicGlobal Maritime and Colonial HistoriesFrench-language works237,207