MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401041201 · doi:10.1093/brain/awae197

Differential reorganization of episodic and semantic memory systems in epilepsy-related mesiotemporal pathology

2024· article· en· W4401041201 on OpenAlexafffund
Donna Gift Cabalo, Jordan DeKraker, Jessica Royer, Ke Xie, Shahin Tavakol, Raúl Rodríguez‐Cruces, Andrea Bernasconi, Neda Bernasconi, Alexander G. Weil, Raluca Pana, Birgit Frauscher, Lorenzo Caciagli, Elizabeth Jefferies, Jonathan Smallwood, Boris C. Bernhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineQueen's UniversityMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersUCLH Biomedical Research CentreBrain Research UKCanadian Open Neuroscience PlatformHospital for Sick ChildrenChina Scholarship CouncilCanada First Research Excellence FundCanada Research ChairsSavoy FoundationMcGill UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRéseau en Bio-Imagerie du QuebecFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéFonds de recherche du QuébecNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation Brain Canada
KeywordsEpilepsyEpisodic memoryNeuroscienceSemantic memoryTemporal lobeDifferential diagnosisPsychologyMedicinePathologyCognitive psychologyCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Declarative memory encompasses episodic and semantic divisions. Episodic memory captures singular events with specific spatiotemporal relationships, whereas semantic memory houses context-independent knowledge. Behavioural and functional neuroimaging studies have revealed common and distinct neural substrates of both memory systems, implicating mesiotemporal lobe (MTL) regions such as the hippocampus and distributed neocortices. Here, we explored declarative memory system reorganization in patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) as a human disease model to test the impact of variable degrees of MTL pathology on memory function. Our cohort included 31 patients with TLE and 60 age- and sex-matched healthy controls, and all participants underwent episodic and semantic retrieval tasks during a multimodal MRI session. The functional MRI tasks were closely matched in terms of stimuli and trial design. Capitalizing on non-linear connectome gradient-mapping techniques, we derived task-based functional topographies during episodic and semantic memory states, in both the MTL and neocortical networks. Comparing neocortical and hippocampal functional gradients between TLE patients and healthy controls, we observed a marked topographic reorganization of both neocortical and MTL systems during episodic memory states. Neocortical alterations were characterized by reduced functional differentiation in TLE across lateral temporal and midline parietal cortices in both hemispheres. In the MTL, in contrast, patients presented with a more marked functional differentiation of posterior and anterior hippocampal segments ipsilateral to the seizure focus and pathological core, indicating perturbed intrahippocampal connectivity. Semantic memory reorganization was also found in bilateral lateral temporal and ipsilateral angular regions, whereas hippocampal functional topographies were unaffected. Furthermore, leveraging MRI proxies of MTL pathology, we observed alterations in hippocampal microstructure and morphology that were associated with TLE-related functional reorganization during episodic memory. Moreover, correlation analysis and statistical mediation models revealed that these functional alterations contributed to behavioural deficits in episodic memory, but again not in semantic memory in patients. Altogether, our findings suggest that semantic processes rely on distributed neocortical networks, whereas episodic processes are supported by a network involving both the hippocampus and the neocortex. Alterations of such networks can provide a compact signature of state-dependent reorganization in conditions associated with MTL damage, such as TLE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207