Decision-focused neural adaptive search and diving for optimizing mining complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optimizing industrial mining complexes, from extraction to end-product delivery, presents a significant challenge due to non-linear aspects and uncertainties inherent in mining operations. The two-stage stochastic integer program for optimizing mining complexes under joint supply and demand uncertainties leads to a formulation with tens of millions of variables and non-linear constraints, thereby challenging the computational limits of state-of-the-art solvers. To address this complexity, a novel solution methodology is proposed, integrating context-aware machine learning and optimization for decision-making under uncertainty. This methodology comprises three components: (i) a hyper-heuristic that optimizes the dynamics of mining complexes, modeled as a graph structure, (ii) a neural diving policy that efficiently performs dives into the primal heuristic selection tree, and (iii) a neural adaptive search policy that learns a block sampling function to guide low-level heuristics and restrict the search space. The proposed neural adaptive search policy introduces the first soft (heuristic) branching strategy in mining literature, adapting the learning-to-branch framework to an industrial context. Deployed in an online fashion, the proposed hybrid methodology is shown to optimize some of the most complex case studies, accounting for varying degrees of uncertainty modeling complexity. Theoretical analyses and computational experiments validate the components’ efficacy, adaptability, and robustness, showing substantial reductions in primal suboptimality and decreased execution times, with improved and more robust solutions that yield higher net present values of up to 40%. While primarily grounded in mining, the methodology shows potential for enabling smart, robust decision-making under uncertainty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".