Consécration du VTA comme instrument de police de mise à distance des demandes d’asile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce document a t gnr automatiquement le 4 septembre 2025.Le texte et les autres lments (illustrations, fichiers annexes imports), sont Tous droits rservs , sauf mention contraire.Conscration du VTA comme instrument de police de mise distance des demandes d'asile Droit d'asile (Visa de transit aroportuaire) Caroline Lantero 1 En rejetant le rfr-libert dirig contre une dcision ministrielle portant soumission des ressortissants syriens un visa de transit aroportuaire (VTA), le juge des rfrs du Conseil d'Etat tolre un mcanisme qui a pourtant pour effet, mais aussi pour objet, d'empcher une demande d'asile.Dans le cadre d'un rfr, l'office du juge administratif tait certes limit.De plus, un recours pour excs de pouvoir actuellement pendant contre cette mme dcision permettra sans doute au Conseil d'Etat de raliser un examen et un contrle plus approfondis.Mais d'ores et dj, le discours employ au sein du Palais Royal pour admettre ce mcanisme donne prise la critique.En particulier, l'vocation d' afflux incontrls au sujet des demandeurs d'asile syriens laisse perplexe, tout comme le regrettable amalgame entre demandeur d'asile et migrant clandestin .Conscration du VTA comme instrument de police de mise distance des demande...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".