Antiviral Activity, Pharmacoinformatics, Molecular Docking, and Dynamics Studies of <i>Azadirachta indica</i> Against Nipah Virus by Targeting Envelope Glycoprotein: Emerging Strategies for Developing Antiviral Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Nipah virus (NiV) belongs to the Henipavirus genus is a serious public health concern causing numerous outbreaks with higher fatality rate. Unfortunately, there is no effective medication available for NiV. To investigate possible inhibitors of NiV infection, we used in silico techniques to discover treatment candidates in this work. As there are not any approved treatments for NiV infection, the NiV-enveloped attachment glycoprotein was set as target for our study, which is responsible for binding to and entering host cells. Our in silico drug design approach included molecular docking, post-docking molecular mechanism generalised born surface area (MM-GBSA), absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion/toxicity (ADME/T), and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We retrieved 418 phytochemicals associated with the neem plant ( Azadirachta indica) from the IMPPAT database, and molecular docking was used to ascertain the compounds’ binding strength. The top 3 phytochemicals with binding affinities of −7.118, –7.074, and −6.894 kcal/mol for CIDs 5280343, 9064, and 5280863, respectively, were selected for additional study based on molecular docking. The post-docking MM-GBSA of those 3 compounds was −47.56, –47.3, and −43.15 kcal/mol, respectively. As evidence of their efficacy and safety, all the chosen drugs had favorable toxicological and pharmacokinetic (Pk) qualities. We also performed MD simulations to confirm the stability of the ligand-protein complex structures and determine whether the selected compounds are stable at the protein binding site. All 3 phytochemicals, Quercetin (CID: 5280343), Cianidanol (CID: 9064), and Kaempferol (CID: 5280863), appeared to have outstanding binding stability to the target protein than control ribavirin, according to the molecular docking, MM-GBSA, and MD simulation outcomes. Overall, this work offers a viable approach to developing novel medications for treating NiV infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".