CPTu-Based Spatial Variability Assessment of Thickened and Conventional Mine Tailings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM) promotes performance-based approaches in geotechnical assessments. Hence, characterizing the spatial variability of deposited tailings is expected to be a key input for some tailings storage facilities (TSFs); however, it has seldom been investigated. In this study, we assess the spatial variability of thickened and conventional tailings, which have been deposited into the same TSF, providing a unique opportunity to investigate two tailings technologies. A dense array of 15 cone penetration tests (CPTus) with an average offset of 1.5 m has been conducted to collect data. In addition to evaluating the spatial variability, the collected information is also used to assess the potential of machine learning (ML) for detrending when deriving random fields. Using a new proposed stationarity score, we find that an ML-based detrending outperforms traditional procedures for most scenarios. In terms of correlation lengths, we find similar ranges for thickened and conventional tailings (vertical: δwv=0.2–0.6 m, horizontal δwh=1.5–4.5 m) and similar distributions, likely influenced by the depositional processes. In contrast, the variance in the conventional tailings is higher, which we attribute to its segregating nature. Finally, by inspecting previous studies on natural soils, we find that the variability of mine tailings (δwh/δwv=2–21) resembles that observed in alluvial deposits, which we attribute to the parallels in the depositional processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".