MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401053160 · doi:10.1061/ajrua6.rueng-1313

Enhanced Prediction and Uncertainty Analysis for In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Resistance of Unreinforced Masonry Walls: A Multifidelity Approach

2024· article· en· W4401053160 on OpenAlexaff
Bowen Zeng, Carlos Cruz-Noguez, Yong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnreinforced masonry buildingPlane (geometry)MasonryResistance (ecology)Structural engineeringGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceGeologyEnvironmental scienceMathematicsGeometryBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unreinforced masonry (URM) walls are commonly found in historic and legacy buildings around the world. The structural resistance of URM walls under in-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP) loads is of primary concern to engineers, as their failure is generally sudden, with catastrophic loss of strength and structural integrity. Due to the complex behavior and inherent uncertainties of the masonry material, engineers opt for the use of low-fidelity (LF) resistance models with limited accuracy, such as design code models and other simplified analytical models in the literature. Models with enhanced prediction accuracy have attracted growing attention, particularly when uncertainty analysis (e.g., reliability evaluation) is needed. As such, high-fidelity (HF) models, such as nonlinear finite element models based on advanced computational mechanics, have been developed and used to characterize the structural behaviors and failure modes of URM walls, particularly the resistance, with remarkable success in terms of accuracy. However, their direct use for resistance prediction and uncertainty analysis is scarce due to the computational burden and technical complications. To address this issue, this study takes an efficient multifidelity (MF) approach that leverages both HF and LF models via information fusion to enhance LF models with only a few HF model evaluations for URM walls. The main research thrust is to develop an MF surrogate model to facilitate uncertainty analysis in the IP and OOP resistance of URM walls. The analysis results indicate that the MF surrogate models developed are capable of achieving significant improvements in terms of accuracy and efficiency in predicting the IP and OOP resistances of URM walls both deterministically and probabilistically, compared with the LF model and the surrogate model developed only based on a limited number of HF model runs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil EngineeringSame topicMasonry and Concrete Structural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207