MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401054121 · doi:10.1142/s0129167x24500617

Slope inequality for an arbitrary divisor

2024· article· en· W4401054121 on OpenAlexaff
Houari Benammar Ammar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mathematics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsDivisor (algebraic geometry)InequalityPure mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let [Formula: see text] be a surjective morphism with connected fibers from a smooth complex projective surface [Formula: see text] to a smooth complex projective curve [Formula: see text] with general fiber [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we develop a more general version of the slope inequality for data [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is an arbitrary relatively effective divisor on [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is a locally free sub-sheaf of [Formula: see text]. We see how the speciality of [Formula: see text], restricted to the general fiber, plays a role in the results. Moreover, we compute some natural examples and provide applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of MathematicsSame topicMathematics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207