Spectro-ViT: A vision transformer model for GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS reconstruction using spectrograms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the use of a Vision Transformer (ViT) for reconstructing GABA-edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) data from a reduced number of transients. Transients refer to the samples collected during an MRS acquisition by repeating the experiment to generate a signal of sufficient quality. Specifically, 80 transients were used instead of the typical 320 transients, aiming to reduce scan time. The 80 transients were pre-processed and converted into a spectrogram image representation using the Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT). A pre-trained ViT, named Spectro-ViT, was fine-tuned and then tested using in-vivo GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS data. Its performance was compared against other pipelines in the literature using quantitative quality metrics and estimated metabolite concentration values, with the typical 320-transient scans serving as the reference for comparison. The Spectro-ViT model exhibited the best overall quality metrics among all other pipelines against which it was compared. The metabolite concentrations from Spectro-ViT's reconstructions for GABA+ achieved the best average R2 value of 0.67 and the best average Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) value of 9.68%, with no significant statistical differences found compared to the 320-transient reference. The code to reproduce this research is available at https://github.com/MICLab-Unicamp/Spectro-ViT
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".