Neurophysiological, structural, and molecular alterations in the prefrontal and auditory cortices following noise-induced hearing loss
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is well established that hearing loss can lead to widespread plasticity within the central auditory pathway, which is thought to contribute to the pathophysiology of audiological conditions such as tinnitus and hyperacusis. Emerging evidence suggests that hearing loss can also result in plasticity within brain regions involved in higher-level cognitive functioning like the prefrontal cortex; findings which may underlie the association between hearing loss and cognitive impairment documented in epidemiological studies. Using the 40-Hz auditory steady state response to assess sound-evoked gamma oscillations, we previously showed that noise-induced hearing loss results in impaired gamma phase coherence within the prefrontal but not the auditory cortex. To determine whether region-specific structural or molecular changes accompany this differential plasticity following hearing loss, in the present study we utilized Golgi-Cox staining to assess dendritic organization and synaptic density, as well as Western blotting to measure changes in synaptic signaling proteins in these cortical regions. We show that following noise exposure, impaired gamma phase coherence within the prefrontal cortex is accompanied by alterations in pyramidal cell dendritic morphology and decreased expression of proteins involved in GABAergic (GAD65) and glutamatergic (NR2B) neurotransmission; findings that were not observed in the auditory cortex, where gamma phase coherence remained unchanged post-noise exposure. In contrast to the noise-induced effects we observed in the prefrontal cortex, plasticity in the auditory cortex was characterized by an increase in NR2B suggesting increased excitability, as well as increases in the synaptic proteins PSD95 and synaptophysin within the auditory cortex. Overall, our results highlight the disparate effect of noise-induced hearing loss on auditory and higher-level brain regions as well as potential structural and molecular mechanisms by which hearing loss may contribute to impaired cognitive and sensory functions mediated by the prefrontal and auditory cortices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".