Bayesian optimization-based Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning: Application to predict maximum cyclic moment resistance of steel bolted T-stub connections
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Developed a Bayesian optimization-based MAML model for bolted T-stub connections. • Addressed limitations in traditional ANN models and ASCE 41-17 standard. • Validated the generalization capabilities of the optimized MAML. Accurately assessing the maximum moment resistance of steel bolted T-stub connections under cyclic loading is crucial for designing earthquake-resistant structures with such connections. Traditional methods based on design standards like ASCE 41-17 often lack precision. Recently, supervised machine learning techniques, particularly Artificial Neural Network (ANN), have been explored. However, conventional ANNs require substantial data for generalization, which is limited for steel bolted T-stub connections. To address these challenges, this study explores the feasibility of using the Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) to predict the maximum cyclic moment resistance of steel bolted T-stub connections. MAML adapts task-specific model parameters rapidly and transfers knowledge across tasks to fine-tune global model parameters, potentially enhancing prediction accuracy with limited data. The MAML model is first optimized using Bayesian optimization with a Gaussian Process model to identify ideal hyperparameters. The optimized MAML model is then compared with two ANN models (one with optimized hyperparameters, another matching MAML's neural network architecture) and ASCE 41-17 method. Results demonstrate the optimized MAML model's superior generalization capabilities, offering a promising approach for steel bolted T-stub connections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it