Cooperative Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Joint Sleep and Power Control in RIS-Aided Energy-Efficient RAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Energy efficiency (EE) is one of the most important metrics for envisioned 6G networks, and sleep control, as a cost-efficient approach, can significantly lower power consumption by switching off network devices selectively. Meanwhile, the reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) has emerged as a promising technique to enhance the EE of future wireless networks. In this work, we jointly consider sleep and transmission power control for RIS-aided energy-efficient networks. In particular, considering the timescale difference between sleep control and power control, we introduce a cooperative hierarchical deep reinforcement learning (Co-HDRL) algorithm, enabling hierarchical and intelligent decision-making. Specifically, the meta-controller in Co-HDRL uses cross-entropy metrics to evaluate the policy stability of sub-controllers, and sub-controllers apply the correlated equilibrium to select optimal joint actions. Compared with conventional HDRL, Co-HDRL enables more stable high-level policy generations and low-level action selections. Then, we introduce a fractional programming method for RIS phase-shift control, maximizing the sum-rate under a given transmission power. In addition, we proposed a low-complexity surrogate optimization method as a baseline for RIS control. Finally, simulations show that the RIS-assisted sleep control can achieve more than 16% lower energy consumption and 30% higher EE than baseline algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".