MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Generative AI-Assisted Novel View Synthesis of Coronary Arteries for Angiography

2024· article· en· W4401072350 on OpenAlexaff
John A. McNulty, Bahareh Taji, Derek So, Aun‐Yeong Chong, Pascal Thériault-Lauzier, AJ Wisniewski, Shervin Shirmohammadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCoronary arteriesAngiographyCoronary angiographyArtificial intelligenceGenerative grammarComputer visionRadiologyCardiologyInternal medicineMedicineArteryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rotational cardiac angiography, though a useful imaging technique, has certain limitations. It can be time-consuming to acquire the images and may require expertise and special equipment for image acquisition. To overcome that, three-dimensional (3D) image reconstruction, specifically the novel view synthesis method, can help. One such method is Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF), which has gained popularity as a robust method in 3D scene reconstruction and generating novel views. In this study, we apply MedNeRF, an advanced generative neural radiance field architecture, to a novel dataset of 800 rotational coronary angiograms—a scale not previously explored. MedNeRF's design allows it to learn from multiple scenes simultaneously, a significant advantage over traditional models that focus on single-scene optimization. This feature is particularly beneficial for our dataset, where traditional NeRF techniques fail. Our exploration reveals that while MedNeRF has shown promising results in CT scans, applying it to the higher resolution and dynamic nature of X-ray angiograms presents unique challenges. To bridge this gap, we introduce preprocessing methods tailored for X-ray angiography, such as MSRCP and MSRCR, which enhance MedNeRF's qualitative output, highlighting the nuanced details essential for accurate medical analysis. However, we identified key limitations: MedNeRF's original configuration struggles with the high resolution of our data <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(\mathbf{512}\times \mathbf{512})$</tex> and lacks the ability to capture temporal changes, crucial for fully understanding the dynamic processes in angiography. Addressing these challenges, our study pioneers in setting benchmarks for the application of NeRF technologies in this domain, demonstrating the need for integrating dynamic components into generative NeRF models to better suit medical imaging tasks. Our findings not only provide a foundational framework for utilizing NeRF in analyzing complex angiographic data but also open pathways for future research. We suggest the exploration of models that merge generative, and dynamic NeRF architectures to create more adaptable and detailed imaging solutions. This work paves the way for significant advancements in medical imaging, with the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient care by enabling clearer and more detailed visualization of angiographic data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207