MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Zero-Shot Multi-Task Cough Sound Analysis with Speech Foundation Model Embeddings

2024· article· en· W4401072402 on OpenAlexafffund
Brady Laska, Pengcheng Xi, Julio J. Valdés, Bruce Wallace, Rafik Goubran

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaCarleton University
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsZero (linguistics)Computer scienceTask (project management)Speech recognitionFoundation (evidence)One shotShot (pellet)AcousticsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supportive smart home systems with integrated personalized cough analysis can support independent living and aging in place by helping monitor the state of acute and chronic health conditions. The stages of recognizing coughs, associating them to an individual, and analyzing the cough characteristics have traditionally been handled independently, using task-specific networks or algorithms. In contrast, recent transformer-based neural network speech foundation models trained on internet-scale datasets have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of tasks. Learning such a general-purpose cough representation has been hampered by the lack of large-scale cough-specific datasets. In this work we demonstrate that the embeddings from a speech foundation model (w2v BERT 2.0) can be used as a powerful multi-purpose cough representation. We show that cough information is well encoded in the model, despite it being trained on speech data with no cough-specific fine-tuning or adapters. Zero-shot linear classification on the cough embeddings achieves strong performance on cough/breathing/speech discrimination (100%), cougher verification (96.9%), cougher identification (84.4%), and wet/dry cough classification (93.8%) tasks. We also show that distance metrics between cough embeddings is meaningful and use that to conduct explainable analysis of an unlabelled sample with similarity-based retrieval from a labelled dataset. We note these capabilities emerge in the early layers of the network, and that the cough embeddings occupy a small region of the embedding space, motivating future work into lower-complexity cough-specific representations suitable for embedded cough analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207