MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401072994 · doi:10.1109/jrfid.2024.3435875

A High-Performance Learning-Based Framework for Monocular 3-D Point Cloud Reconstruction

2024· article· en· W4401072994 on OpenAlexaff
AmirHossein Zamani, Kamran Ghaffari, Amir G. Aghdam

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Radio Frequency Identification · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint cloudComputer scienceMonocularCloud computingPoint (geometry)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionMathematicsGeometryOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An essential yet challenging step in the 3D reconstruction problem is to train a machine or a robot to model 3D objects. Many 3D reconstruction applications depend on real-time data processing, so computational efficiency is a fundamental requirement in such systems. Despite considerable progress in 3D reconstruction techniques in recent years, developing efficient algorithms for real-time implementation remains an open problem. The present study addresses current issues in the high-precision reconstruction of objects displayed in a single-view image with sufficiently high accuracy and computational efficiency. To this end, we propose two neural frameworks: a CNN-based autoencoder architecture called Fast-Image2Point (FI2P) and a transformer-based network called TransCNN3D. These frameworks consist of two stages: perception and construction. The perception stage addresses the understanding and extraction process of the underlying contexts and features of the image. The construction stage, on the other hand, is responsible for recovering the 3D geometry of an object by using the knowledge and contexts extracted in the perception stage. The FI2P is a simple yet powerful architecture to reconstruct 3D objects from images faster (in real-time) without losing accuracy. Then, the TransCNN3D framework provides a more accurate 3D reconstruction without losing computational efficiency. The output of the reconstruction framework is represented in the point cloud format. The ShapeNet dataset is utilized to compare the proposed method with the existing ones in terms of computation time and accuracy. Simulations demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed strategy. Our dataset and code are available on IEEE DataPort website and first author’s GitHub repository respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Radio Frequency IdentificationSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207