MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401088836 · doi:10.18280/acsm.480303

Characterization Study of the Earth Bricks Used in the Old Constructions of the Boussaâda Area

2024· article· en· W4401088836 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Naoui Tallah, Ammar Geuttouche

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Architecture and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarth (classical element)Characterization (materials science)AstrobiologyGeologyMaterials sciencePhysicsNanotechnologyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a study on earth bricks (adobe) used in ancient earth constructions in the region of Boussaâ da, located in the southeast of northern Algeria.The objective is to evaluate the physical and mechanical properties, including compressive and shear strength, as well as the thermal characteristics of these bricks, with the aim of promoting their use on a large scale.The results of the physical and identification analyses showed that the bricks studied are silty sands.The compression tests gave an average compressive strength of 0.2 MPa.The shear tests gave an average cohesion of 172.22 kPa and an average internal friction angle of 63.92°.The average thermal conductivity is 0.7291 W/m.K.The results obtained show that Boussaâ da earth bricks have satisfactory physical and mechanical characteristics.The compressive strength is low, but it is sufficient for the construction of one or two storey buildings.Cohesion and internal friction angle are satisfactory for the stability of brick walls.The thermal conductivity is low, which makes Boussaâ da earth bricks good thermal insulators.The results obtained reveal that the composition of these adobes can be used to make quality bricks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicMedieval Architecture and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207