Predicting Flight Trajectory in Convective Weather through Boosted Spatiotemporal Deep Learning Ensemble
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flight trajectory prediction is one of the key issues in ensuring the safety of air traffic, providing the air traffic controller with the foresight of flight conflicts so that control instructions for pilots can be preconceived. In a complicated mechanism, flight trajectories can be severely affected by convective weather, making accurately predicting trajectories challenging. To address this problem, we propose a boosted spatiotemporal deep learning ensemble for mining the law of how convective weather affects flight trajectory stretching. Instead of conventionally representing trajectory data in a geographic coordinate system, we design a relative coordinate system for gaining new trajectory features which tangibly reflect trajectory’s relations with planned route and convective weather. Besides, we raise a boosted ensemble framework of spatiotemporal deep learning models, trained by the samples pairing sequential trajectory with graphical weather, dedicating to strengthen the mining of the high‐value training samples that involve explicit flight deviations caused by convective weather. The experiments using actual flight and weather data demonstrate our method’s superiority in predicting flight trajectory affected by convective weather.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it