Unlocking the potential of digital twins in supply chains: A systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Digital Twins (DTs) developments are still in the pilot stages of deployment in supply chain management (SCM), and their full integration with real-time synchronization and autonomous decision-making poses many challenges. This paper aims to identify these common challenges and provide a conceptual framework for establishing a Digital Twin (DT) system to improve supply chain management performance. The paper presents a systematic literature review of 129 research papers on DT applications for SCM improvement. The selected papers were reviewed and classified into three categories: manufacturing and production, supply chain, and logistics. The development of digital technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) devices, cloud computing, cyber-physical systems (CPSs), cybersecurity (CS), and simulation modeling has increased the opportunities to explore the creation of supply chain DTs. However, there are limitations and various challenges due to the complexity of most systems. The results indicate that DT for SCM should include external links (i.e. suppliers, distributors) and internal links (i.e. procurement, production, logistics) to deal with any disruption through data-driven modeling with real-time synchronization. Based on the review findings, this study proposes a three-layered conceptual framework to improve supply chain management performance. The proposed framework provides future directions for DT research in SCM. It provides a holistic and integrated approach to DT implementation, the common DT technologies, and data analytics techniques for improved supply chain performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".