RSA-1024 Cryptography on Artix-7 FPGA: Medical Imaging Application
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the domain of medical imaging, ensuring the security of confidential patient data stands as a paramount concern. The imperative for robust encryption to safeguard medical images against unauthorized access has driven the widespread adoption of the RSA algorithm, celebrated for its efficacy in data security assurance. This study specifically centers on the deployment of RSA-1024 cryptography on an Artix-7 FPGA, targeting applications in medical imaging. Acknowledging the demand for heightened security and accelerated processing, we have engineered RSA crypto-accelerators as hardware implementations of the RSA algorithm. We present a comprehensive methodology for implementing the 1024-bit RSA encryption/decryption algorithm, leveraging the square and multiply technique for modular exponentiation. Our algorithms are meticulously instantiated through VHDL code, tailored for execution on the Artix-7 xc7a35tcsg324-1 FPGA manufactured by Xilinx. Rigorous testing using the Vivado 2022.2 tool validates the functionality and dependability of our design. This research underscores the pivotal role of advanced cryptographic methodologies in safeguarding medical images and underscores the strides made in FPGA-based security solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it