A Unified Approach for Binary-Class and Multi-Class Data Augmented Generation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep neural networks excel in a wide range of tasks but require diverse datasets to prevent overfitting. Overfitting occurs when a network fits training data too precisely, leading to poor generalization. Data Augmentation is often used to mitigate overfitting aiming at enlarging and improving the quality of training datasets, facilitating the construction of superior deep learning models. MAGAN algorithm emerges as an innovative approach that functions as a Meta-Analysis of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). MAGAN harnesses the latent space capabilities of GANs to confront the challenges presented by binary-class, multi-class, grayscale, and RGB images, effectively covering a wide spectrum of scenarios. In this paper, we propose the use of MAGAN algorithm for binary-class and multi-class data augmented generation. We also undertake an in-depth experimental analysis, evaluating the performance of the proposed MAGAN-based approach in comparison to two alternative baseline scenarios: one without any augmentation and another utilizing a conventional augmentation method. To gauge the effectiveness of the proposed technique, we employed diverse classification metrics, including accuracy, loss, precision, recall, F1-score, and the confusion matrix. Our results demonstrate that the proposed approach surpasses the other two scenarios achieving improvements in terms of accuracy by a factor of x1.15 and x1.03, respectively. This underscores the significant advantages of harnessing MAGAN, a meta-analysis of GANs, for data augmentation across a range of image types and classification tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".