MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Parallel Fast Direct Error-Controlled Scattering Solutions via an $\mathcal{H}$-Matrix-Accelerated Locally Corrected Nyström Method for the Combined Field Integral Equation

2024· article· en· W4401114372 on OpenAlexaff
Omid Babazadeh, Jin Hu, Emrah Sever, Ian Jeffrey, Constantine Sideris, Vladimir Okhmatovski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatteringIntegral equationMatrix (chemical analysis)Field (mathematics)Nyström methodMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisComputational physicsMaterials scienceOpticsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A parallel, fast, direct, high-order solution of the Locally Corrected Nyström (LCN) method discretization of the combined field integral equation (CFIE) is presented for solving scattering problems involving perfect electric conductors (PECs) of arbitrary shape. The discrete LCN operator is represented using the hierarchical matrix ($\mathcal{H}$-matrix) framework to accelerate the filling and solving processes, while consuming a fraction of the memory conventionally required for the dense system. The solver is validated for an exact parametrization of the surface of a sphere with quadrilateral patches (i.e., a mapped sphere). The accuracy is also studied for high-order solutions of arbitrary shapes, demonstrating a$\mathcal{O}(h^{p})$convergence. Results from this direct solver are indicative that the$\mathcal{H}$-matrix-accelerated LCN method will provide a flexible error-controllable preconditioner for general scattering problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207