Effects of inflammatory stimuli on the development of Mycoplasma bovis pneumonia in experimentally challenged calves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many cattle infected with Mycoplasma bovis remain healthy while others develop severe chronic respiratory disease. We hypothesized that inflammatory stimuli such as co-pathogens worsen disease outcomes in M. bovis-infected calves. Calves (n=24) were intrabronchially inoculated with M. bovis and either killed bacterial lysate, transient M. haemolytica infection, or saline. Caseonecrotic lesions developed in 7/7 animals given M. haemolytica and M. bovis compared to 2/8 given M. bovis with no inflammatory stimulus, and 6/9 animals given bacterial lysate and M. bovis (P=0.01). Animals receiving M. haemolytica and M. bovis had more caseonecrotic foci in lungs than those receiving M. bovis with no inflammatory stimulus (median = 21 vs 0; P = 0.01), with an intermediate response (median = 5) in animals given bacterial lysate. In addition to caseonecrotic foci, infected animals developed neutrophilic bronchiolitis that appeared to develop into caseonecrotic foci, peribronchiolar lymphocytic cuffs that were not associated with the other lesions, and 4 animals with bronchiolitis obliterans. The data showed that transient lung inflammation at the time of M. bovis infection provoked the development of caseonecrotic bronchopneumonia, and the severity of inflammation influenced the number of caseonecrotic foci that developed. In contrast, caseonecrotic lesions were few or absent in M. bovis-infected calves without a concurrent inflammatory stimulus. These studies provide insight into how caseonecrotic lesions develop within the lung of M. bovis-infected calves. This and other studies suggest that controlling co-pathogens and harmful inflammatory responses in animals infected with M. bovis could potentially minimize development of M. bovis caseonecrotic bronchopneumonia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".