Additively manufactured conformal cooling channels through topology optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cooling channels play a critical role in various casting and molding processes, impacting both the cycle time and quality of the product. As additive manufacturing technologies become increasingly prevalent, conventional straight-drilled channels are being progressively substituted by intricate cooling lines that conform to the contours of the fabricated part. This transition can lead to a significant reduction of the solidification time and temperature gradients, consequently lowering the occurrence of part defects. However, designing such channels becomes challenging as geometric complexity and manufacturing constraints increase. In this work, we present a density-based topology optimization approach to generate conformal cooling channels in molds and dies inserts. To mitigate temperature variations, the objective function is penalized using the temperature standard deviation of the insert cavity surface. A density-gradient-based constraint is further utilized to reduce the generation of overhanging structures and promote manufacturability. In particular, the use of this constraint leads to the generation of channels characterized by a teardrop-shaped cross section. The cooling efficiency of a selected optimized design is confirmed through computations using a body-fitted solver. The geometry is subsequently manufactured by Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) and experiments are conducted to compare its performance in comparison to a design featuring straight-drilled channels. The results demonstrate that the optimized geometry significantly enhances the heat extraction rate and further leads to a 43% reduction of the cavity temperature standard deviation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".