MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401120023 · doi:10.3390/v16081220

Poly(rC)-Binding Protein 2 Does Not Directly Participate in HCV Translation or Replication, but Rather Modulates Genome Packaging

2024· article· en· W4401120023 on OpenAlexafffund
Sophie Cousineau, C.R. Camargo, Selena M. Sagan

Bibliographic record

VenueViruses · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of AlbertaCanada Research ChairsMcGill University
KeywordsReplication (statistics)Translation (biology)GenomeCell biologyChemistryBiologyVirologyGeneticsMessenger RNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-opts many cellular factors-including proteins and microRNAs-to complete its life cycle. A cellular RNA-binding protein, poly(rC)-binding protein 2 (PCBP2), was previously shown to bind to the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome; however, its precise role in the viral life cycle remained unclear. Herein, using the HCV cell culture (HCVcc) system and assays that isolate each step of the viral life cycle, we found that PCBP2 does not have a direct role in viral entry, translation, genome stability, or HCV RNA replication. Rather, our data suggest that PCBP2 depletion only impacts viral RNAs that can undergo genome packaging. Taken together, our data suggest that endogenous PCBP2 modulates the early steps of genome packaging, and therefore only has an indirect effect on viral translation and RNA replication, likely by increasing the translating/replicating pool of viral RNAs to the detriment of virion assembly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVirusesSame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207