MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401122592 · doi:10.17118/11143/21778

La novità ecologica attraverso la lessicografia italiana

2023· article· it· W4401122592 on OpenAlex
Michele Ortore

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCircula · 2023
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Riassunto : Nello studio si prende in esame la ricezione della novità ecologica all’interno dei vocabolari italiani, in ottica diacronica e sincronica. Nella lessicografia, infatti, è possibile identificare le tracce di come l’italiano abbia accolto nel suo sistema lessicale la nascita e lo sviluppo di questa scienza e della relativa terminologia. Essendo l’ecologia una scienza giovane, nata a fine Ottocento, è prima di tutto utile fare il punto sul trattamento ricevuto nei vocabolari e sui problemi posti alla sistemazione lessicografica. Il suo paradigma scientifico, inoltre, inizialmente legato alla biologia e alle scienze naturali, è stato rivoluzionato dall’esplosione dei movimenti ambientalisti, che hanno trasformato lo studio neutro degli ecosistemi in una scienza tesa alla verifica critica degli squilibri naturali prodotti dalle attività umane: è apparso perciò utile ricostruire questa svolta ripercorrendo in diacronia l’evoluzione della definizione di ecologia nei dizionari italiani. Infine, attraverso un piccolo campione di parole chiave legate alla crisi climatica (sostenibilità e derivati, effetto serra), s’indagherà la capacità dei vocabolari italiani di rimanere al passo con un’evoluzione semantica rapidissima, spesso consolidata dall’azione delle istituzioni governative.||Abstract : The study examines the reception of the new ecological prospective within the Italian vocabularies, from a diachronic and synchronic perspective. In lexicography, in fact, it is possible to identify the traces of how Italian has received in its lexical system the birth and the development of this science and its terminology. Ecology being a young science, born at the end of the 19th century, it is first of all useful to take stock of the treatment received in vocabularies and the problems posed to the lexicographic system. Its scientific paradigm, moreover, initially linked to biology and the natural sciences, was revolutionised by the explosion of environmental movements, which transformed the neutral study of ecosystems into a science aimed at the critical verification of the natural imbalances produced by human activities. It therefore seemed useful to reconstruct this turning point by retracing in diachrony the evolution of the definition of ecology in Italian dictionaries. Finally, through a small sample of key words linked to the climate crisis (sustainability and derivatives, greenhouse effect), we will investigate the ability of Italian vocabularies to keep pace with a very rapid semantic evolution, often consolidated by the action of governmental institutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it