MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401124745 · doi:10.1002/sdtp.17645

57‐3: Driver's Attention Retargeting for Automotive Displays

2024· article· en· W4401124745 on OpenAlexaff
Seungchul Ryu, Hyunjin Yoo, Jean Lorchat, Tara Akhavan

Bibliographic record

VenueSID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety
Canadian institutionsFaurecia (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetargetingAutomotive industryHuman–computer interactionComputer graphics (images)Computer scienceAutomotive engineeringComputer visionPsychologyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While driving, a driver often looks at the display for an emirror, front‐driving camera, rear‐view camera, and night‐vision camera, which may result in a potential safety issue. This paper proposes a retargeting method of driver's attention to important regions, thereby decreasing a potential driving safety issue. Specifically, the proposed method processes the input image to increase the driver's attention on more important regions while decreasing the attention on less important regions. The qualitative and quantitative evaluation proved the advantages and practicability of the proposed framework in retargeting the driver's attention to more important regions from less important regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSID Symposium Digest of Technical PapersSame topicHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyFrench-language works237,207