MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401124880 · doi:10.1002/sdtp.17632

54‐2: Diffraction Issues of Under Display IR Sensor in AMOLED Displays

2024· article· en· W4401124880 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSurface Roughness and Optical Measurements
Canadian institutionsOTI Lumionics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAMOLEDMaterials scienceDiffractionOptoelectronicsComputer graphics (images)Computer scienceOpticsThin-film transistorNanotechnologyActive matrixPhysicsLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates diffraction issues in Under Display Infrared (UDIR) sensor applications for 3D facial recognition. While conventional design wisdom emphasizes infrared transmittance, this study introduces a new figure of merit, Zero‐Order Transmittance (ZOT) as a crucial parameter. Patterning the cathode significantly improves ZOT, highlighting its importance in UDIR applications. This emphasizes the need for careful consideration of pixel and aperture layout to achieve high ETZ without compromising performance such as resolution and lifetime of the display.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it