Prospects and Challenges to Energy Sustainability: The Potential of Frying Oil Biodiesel for Sustainable Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Countries around the world are seeking to diversify their energy sources by using renewable energy.This study adopts a sustainability approach to analyze the environmental impacts of used vegetable oils, from their disposal, through their conversion into biodiesel, to their emissions analysis.This study also examines its implications for the 2030 Agenda and global planetary boundaries, and finally explores the Peruvian energy sector as a case study.The selected literature prioritizes the reuse of used vegetable oils to mitigate urban sanitation problems.It highlights that the quality of biodiesel is closely linked to the degree of denaturation of the used oil and the processing technology and that emissions vary depending on the blend with diesel, but a 100% biodiesel combustion reduces greenhouse gases by more than 80%.These characteristics align with SDG 7 and address four of the six transgressed Global Limits.In the Peruvian context, biodiesel production is insufficient, generating environmental and public health problems due to inefficient waste management.It is concluded that efficient management of used vegetable oils is necessary and feasible to promote the use of biodiesel, as well as environmental development policies that facilitate sustainable energy transitions, especially in non-industrialized countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".