MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401135531 · doi:10.5430/wjel.v14n6p400

A Conflict between Tradition and Modernity: Analysis of Marital Issues in Chetan Bhagat’s Select Works

2024· article· en· W4401135531 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. Ramakrishnan, L. Baskaran

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of English Language · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Cinema and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernism (music)ModernityOppressionSociologyAestheticsGender studiesPhilosophyEpistemologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional values, beliefs, practices, and norms are the target of modernism. Modernism’s goal is to eliminate the unfairness, exploitation, and other forms of oppression at the heart of its philosophy. Modern man is eager to learn and grow but also calculating and manipulative. In every aspect of our lives, we have the impact of modernism. Modernism has influenced people’s everyday lives, customs, and habits in today’s society at the fundamental level. Because of these elements, Chetan Bhagat’s fictional tales are traced back to this process of structural transformation. Our society is undergoing fundamental transformation because of these developments. 2 States: The Story of My Marriage and Revolution 2020 by Chetan Bhagat are two great examples of this. This paper attempts to analyse the conflict between tradition and modernity in the marital issues through two novels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.014
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of English LanguageSame topicSouth Asian Cinema and CultureFrench-language works237,207