MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401144305 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110708

A Probabilistic Inventory Problem for Imperfect Quality with Partial Shortage Backordering, Carbon Emission, and Its Computation Using Genetic Algorithm in Python

2024· article· en· W4401144305 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rubono Setiawan

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPython (programming language)ImperfectEconomic shortageComputationComputer scienceProbabilistic logicGenetic algorithmAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMachine learningProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a multiplayer inventory model is discussed that explains the relationship between a single manufacturer and multiple retailers in a supply chain system.There are products with imperfect quality in the quantity of lots produced, resulting from the production and transportation processes.A partial shortage backorder policy is implemented to handle shortage conditions.The cost of greenhouse gas emissions from loading and transportation equipment is also considered in the total cost.The quantity of imperfect products can affect the quantity of products to be shipped.Classical optimization techniques with an integrated approach are used for analytical inventory model analysis.Due to the complexity of the model, the optimal solution is performed using a numerical computational approach.The computational and optimization procedures are implemented in a new algorithm based on the genetic algorithms, which are executed by Python programming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFrench-language works237,207