STRUCTURAL PLANNING OF 4 FLOOR BULDING OFFICE OF HIGH PROSECUTORS, CENTRAL JAVA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perencanaan Struktur suatu Konstruksi bangunan diperlukan untuk mendapatkan dimensi dan konfigurasi struktur yang paling efektif dan efisien. Perencanaan suatu struktur Gedung yang berada di wilayah rawan harus direncanakan sesuai standar, kuat, dan aman gempa. Perencanaan Struktur Gedung 4 Lantai Kantor Kejati Jateng, mengacu pada Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk mengacu Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung (SNI 03-1726-2019) dan Beban Minimum untuk Perancangan Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur lain (SNI 03-1727-2013). Perencanaan Bangunan Struktur Gedung 4 Lantai Kantor Kejati Jateng ini meliputi perencanaan struktur atas dan struktur bawah. Perencanaan Struktur atas menggunakan SAP 2000 V14.2.2, sedangkan struktur bawah direncanakan secara manual. Struktur atas meliputi perencanaan atap, balok, kolom, dan plat lantai Gedung, sedangkan struktur bawah meliputi perencanaan pondasi. Pembebanan yang ditinjau untuk perencanaan elemen struktur adalah beban mati, beban hidup, dan beban gempa. Beban Gempa yang dimasukan adalah beban gempa dinamis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".