MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401157146 · doi:10.1090/spmj/1811

On the vanishing of Green’s function, desingularization and Carleman’s method

2024· article· lv· W4401157146 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Gibara, Damir Kinzebulatov

Bibliographic record

VenueSt Petersburg Mathematical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMathematical analysisFunction (biology)Pure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subject of the present paper is the phenomenon of vanishing for the Green function of the operator − Δ + V -\Delta + V on R 3 \mathbb {R}^3 at the points where the potential V V has positive critical singularities. More precisely, under minimal assumptions on V V (i.e., the form-boundedness), an upper bound on the order of vanishing of the Green function is obtained. As a byproduct, the existing results on the strong unique continuation for eigenfunctions of − Δ + V -\Delta +V in dimension d = 3 d=3 are improved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSt Petersburg Mathematical JournalSame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207