MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401170997 · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103287

Image-level supervision and self-training for transformer-based cross-modality tumor segmentation

2024· article· en· W4401170997 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Image Analysis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCompute Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSegmentationModality (human–computer interaction)Image segmentationModalitiesPattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningMachine learningComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep neural networks are commonly used for automated medical image segmentation, but models will frequently struggle to generalize well across different imaging modalities. This issue is particularly problematic due to the limited availability of annotated data, both in the target as well as the source modality, making it difficult to deploy these models on a larger scale. To overcome these challenges, we propose a new semi-supervised training strategy called MoDATTS. Our approach is designed for accurate cross-modality 3D tumor segmentation on unpaired bi-modal datasets. An image-to-image translation strategy between modalities is used to produce synthetic but annotated images and labels in the desired modality and improve generalization to the unannotated target modality. We also use powerful vision transformer architectures for both image translation (TransUNet) and segmentation (Medformer) tasks and introduce an iterative self-training procedure in the later task to further close the domain gap between modalities, thus also training on unlabeled images in the target modality. MoDATTS additionally allows the possibility to exploit image-level labels with a semi-supervised objective that encourages the model to disentangle tumors from the background. This semi-supervised methodology helps in particular to maintain downstream segmentation performance when pixel-level label scarcity is also present in the source modality dataset, or when the source dataset contains healthy controls. The proposed model achieves superior performance compared to other methods from participating teams in the CrossMoDA 2022 vestibular schwannoma (VS) segmentation challenge, as evidenced by its reported top Dice score of 0.87±0.04 for the VS segmentation. MoDATTS also yields consistent improvements in Dice scores over baselines on a cross-modality adult brain gliomas segmentation task composed of four different contrasts from the BraTS 2020 challenge dataset, where 95% of a target supervised model performance is reached when no target modality annotations are available. We report that 99% and 100% of this maximum performance can be attained if 20% and 50% of the target data is additionally annotated, which further demonstrates that MoDATTS can be leveraged to reduce the annotation burden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it