MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401172933 · doi:10.1101/2024.07.30.24311146

Lesion location changes the association between brain excitability and motor skill acquisition post-stroke

2024· preprint· en· W4401172933 on OpenAlexaff
Bernat de las Heras, Lynden Rodrigues, Jacopo Cristini, Kevin Moncion, Numa Dancause, Alexander Thiel, Jodi D. Edwards, Janice J. Eng, Ada Tang, Marc Roig

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of OttawaVancouver Coastal HealthUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityJewish Rehabilitation Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulationLesionCorticospinal tractNeuroscienceFacilitationPsychologyStroke (engine)Motor cortexInhibitory postsynaptic potentialLateralization of brain functionSilent periodExcitatory postsynaptic potentialPhysical medicine and rehabilitationStimulationMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The capacity to reacquire motor skills lost after a stroke is crucial to promote upper-limb motor recovery but the impact of lesion location on motor skill acquisition and the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain uncertain. Methods We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate associations between excitatory and inhibitory cortico-spinal excitability measures and the capacity to acquire a novel motor skill with the most affected hand in 103 individuals with cortical (n=34) or subcortical (n=69) lesions. Results Both groups showed similar motor skill acquisition, but subcortical lesions exhibited more impairment in the most affected hand and lower excitability in the ipsilesional hemisphere. In cortical lesions, motor skill acquisition was associated with lower motor thresholds (β=-0.25, 95% CI [−0.47,-0.03]; p=0.024) and higher intracortical inhibition (β=-3.93, 95% CI [−6.89,-0.98]; p=0.011) in the ipsilesional hemisphere. In contrast, in subcortical lesions motor skill acquisition was associated with smaller motor evoked potentials (β=-4.46, 95% CI [−8.54,-0.38]; p=0.033), less intracortical inhibition (β=3.45, 95% CI [0.34,6.56]; p=0.030) and higher facilitation (β=1.34,95% CI [0.15,2.54]; p= 0.028) ipsilesionally. Sensitivity analyses revealed that associations with intracortical inhibition and facilitation in the subcortical group were driven by lesions affecting the corticospinal tract. No associations were found in the contralesional hemisphere. Conclusions Reinforcing the existence of lesion-specific neurophysiological patterns, individuals with cortical and subcortical lesions show divergent associations between cortico-spinal excitability and motor skill acquisition. The use of cortico-spinal excitability as a biomarker to predict upper-limb recovery post-stroke or guide motor recovery interventions such as non-invasive brain stimulation should consider lesion location.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies→French-language works237,207→