Uniform-Cost Multi-Path Routing for Reconfigurable Data Center Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reconfigurable data center networks (RDCNs) are arising as a promising data center network (DCN) design in the post-Moore's law era. However, the constantly reconfigured network topology in RDCNs invalidates the assumption of using hop count as the cost metric for routing, e.g., the status quo Equal-Cost Multi-Path routing (ECMP) in traditional DCNs. Unfortunately, existing routing solutions in RDCNs stick to the old assumption and deliver suboptimal performance either high in latency or low in bandwidth efficiency. In this paper, we redefine the cost metric for RDCN routing with uniform cost to unify the effects of topology disruption and hop count on latency and bandwidth efficiency. We propose Uniform-Cost Multi-Path routing (UCMP), an ECMP equivalent for RDCNs, where minimizing uniform cost leads flows of various sizes to the right balance between latency and bandwidth efficiency. Our simulation shows that UCMP achieves 53% to 98% lower flow completion time (FCT) and 1.55× bandwidth efficiency compared to the state-of-the-art RDCN routing strategy, and our testbed implementation demonstrates sustainable switch resource usage of UCMP as RDCNs scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".