Thinking big starting small: identifying considerations for small-scale tidal energy in southwest Nova Scotia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nova Scotia’s marine renewable energy (MRE) sector can contribute to provincial goals for carbon neutrality. With this, tidal energy has been an interest to industry stakeholders for over two decades, yet general momentum for the industry has shifted. Previous tidal energy projects and recent studies suggest there needs to be a shift in focus towards scalable tidal energy (i.e., small-scale) development in the province. This research explores the considerations of developing tidal energy in Southwest Nova Scotia with an emphasis on small-scale tidal devices. Using a comprehensive literature review and in-depth semi-structured interviews with stakeholders from different sectors of Nova Scotia’s MRE energy industry, key issues and challenges were explored. Results underline four main themes that affect industry potential, which include cost and financing, technology, policy, and energy distribution. These results support a discussion around the value of small-scale technology, regulatory pathways, industry collaboration, and using global best practices to accelerate tidal energy industry goals in Nova Scotia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".