Expérimenter les dimensions subjectives et culturelles de la transition avec des jeunes de l’enseignement supérieur.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considérée comme une composante centrale de l’écocitoyenneté, l’éducation par la nature est pourtant souvent absente des programmes de formation dans l’enseignement supérieur. Fort de ce constat, le projet de recherche TransDisc a conçu un dispositif pédagogique expérimental d’immersion en nature. L’objectif principal de ce dispositif était d’expérimenter l’intérêt d’un prototype d’activité ex-situ inspiré par les pédagogies de l’écologie du sensible, en particulier le Travail Qui Relie et l’Intervention Psycho-sociale par la Nature et l’Aventure. Le point commun de ces approches est de donner une place prépondérante au lien d'interdépendance avec le vivant, aux émotions, à l’imagination et au corps. Après avoir clarifié les objectifs et les sources d’inspiration théoriques du dispositif pédagogique, l’article présente les résultats concernant les aspects saillants du dispositif relatifs aux dimensions subjectives et culturelles de la transition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".