MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401180583 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110720

Classification of Heart Sounds Using Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix and Logistic Regression

2024· article· en· W4401180583 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Istiqomah Istiqomah, R. Wardhana, Achmad Rizal

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogistic regressionStatisticsMatrix (chemical analysis)MathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The heart is a person's fundamental organ.Heart sounds can help support healthcare workers by aiding in the early diagnosis of irregular heart rhythms.This study developed a system to categorize heart sounds by employing logistic regression as the classifier and the grey-level co-occurrence matrix as the classifier.For this reason, the GLCM technique was assessed in this work for feature extraction in the heart sound categorization.Moreover, the diagnostic heart sound analysis and classification procedure can be greatly improved by visualizing heart sounds using the Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM).The three data classifications for heart sounds are artifact, murmurs, and normal.Moreover, the heart sound is converted into the timefrequency domain using the short-time Fourier transform (STFT).The gray-level cooccurrence matrix approach is a useful tool for extracting the energy distribution in STFT.Dissimilarity, correlation, homogeneity, contrast, energy, and angular second moment (ASM) are the characteristics of the GLCM extraction.With dissimilarity offering the most feature extraction, logistic regression yields an 82% classification accuracy.The AUC value of 0.7 for the murmur class indicated that the feature and classification model had reduced sensitivity, but it performed well for the normal and artifact classes.This is because there are too few datasets for the murmur class.More abnormal class datasets are hoped to be contributed in the future in order to improve the classifier model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicPhonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207