Logan: Planetary-Scale Genome Assembly Surveys Life’s Diversity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The breadth of life’s diversity is unfathomable, but public nucleic acid sequencing data offers a window into the dispersion and evolution of genetic diversity across Earth. However the rapid growth and accumulation of sequence data have outpaced efficient analysis capabilities. The largest collection of freely available sequencing data is the Sequence Read Archive (SRA), comprising 27.3 million datasets or 5 × 10 16 basepairs. To realize the potential of the SRA, we constructed Logan, a massive sequence assembly transforming short reads into long contigs and compressing the data over 100-fold, enabling highly efficient petabase-scale analysis. We created Logan-Search, a k -mer index of Logan for free planetary-scale sequence search, returning matches in minutes. We used Logan contigs to identify > 200 million plastic-degrading enzyme homologs, and validate novel enzymes with catalytic activities exceeding current reference standards. Further, we vastly expand the known diversity of proteins (30-fold over UniRef50), plasmids (22-fold over PLSDB), P4 satellites (4.5-fold), and the recently described Obelisk RNA elements (3.7-fold). Logan also enables ecological and biomedical data mining, such as global tracking of antimicrobial resistance genes and the characterization of viral reactivation across millions of human BioSamples. By transforming the SRA, Logan democratizes access to the world’s public genetic data and opens frontiers in biotechnology, molecular ecology, and global health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".