MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401180879 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110719

Reaction and Kinetics in Immobilized Glucose Isomerase of Packed-Bed Reactors Using Akbari-Ganji’s Method

2024· article· en· W4401180879 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Menaka Muthuramu, Manimaran Rajendran, Jeyabarathi Ponraj, L. Rajendran

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKineticsGlucose-6-phosphate isomeraseChemistryChemical engineeringChromatographyBiochemistryEnzymeEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear differential equations often arise in many real-world problems.The complexity of solving nonlinear systems arises from the strong interdependence between the variables of the system and the boundary conditions.An immobilized glucose isomerase-based mathematical model for the enzymatic isomerization process that converts glucose to fructose is presented.The model's kinetic mechanism is stated using the nonlinear reaction-diffusion equation for MichalisMenten kinetics.The general approximate analytical formulas for the glucose molar concentration and flux inside packed-bed reactors are determined by solving the nonlinear equation using Akbari-Ganji's method.The effects of the kinetic parameters and pore-level Thiele modulus on concentration and flux were discussed.Estimating the kinetic parameters from current density is suggested.It has been shown that this method reduces processing time without affecting the quality of the solution.This method works well for many different types of nonlinear systems, making it useful in engineering and other fields of science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207