An Effective Particle Swarm Optimization for Lot-Sizing Problem with Particulate Matter Emission Constraint
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The green supply chain is the reduction of the atmospheric release emissions including gases, vapour, smoke, solid or liquid particles.This atmospheric reduction will concern each stage of the chain: supply, production, distribution, warehousing, transport and delivery.The design of this loop is based on industrial ecological perspectives, particularly in the production, and the transport stage.In this work, we present a lotsizing problem with capacitated one warehouse multi retailers (OWMR) under the minimization of particles matter (PM) emission from production and delivery, knowing that the problem is an NP-hard.We have developed a logistics structure containing a production unit connected to a distribution network characterized by (size, number and location) retailers specializing in a single type of product.Then, we will introduce our mathematical problem modelling using mixed-integer programming and develop an approach based on the metaheuristic called binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO) in this approach; we will study new strategies and techniques concerning the particle swarm parameters.The improved BPSO will be tested on a series of benchmark data sets and compared with CPLEX.According to the experimental results, this approach is effective in minimizing the total cost of the supply chain and promoting green technology by reducing the number of the particles emitted into the air.It also provides a decision support system to answer key questions about when and how much produce and distribute in a sustainable environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".