MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401182154 · doi:10.3934/math.20241130

Soliton solutions and a bi-Hamiltonian structure of the fifth-order nonlocal reverse-spacetime Sasa-Satsuma-type hierarchy via the Riemann-Hilbert approach

2024· article· en· W4401182154 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed M. G. Ahmed, Alle Adjiri, Solomon Manukure

Bibliographic record

VenueAIMS Mathematics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMathematical physicsRiemann–Hilbert problemSpacetimeRiemann hypothesisHamiltonian (control theory)Scalar (mathematics)Mathematical analysisSolitonPure mathematicsNonlinear systemPhysicsQuantum mechanicsBoundary value problem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our objective is to explore the intricacies of a nonlinear nonlocal fifth-order scalar Sasa-Satsuma equation in reverse spacetime which is rooted in a nonlocal $ 5 \times 5 $ matrix AKNS spectral problem. Starting with this spectral problem, we derive both local and nonlocal symmetry relations through rotations within a defined group. We then formulate a specific type of Riemann-Hilbert problem, facilitating the generation of soliton solutions. These solutions are generated by utilizing vectors that reside in the kernel of the matrix Jost solutions. Under the condition where reflection coefficients are null, the jump matrix reduces to the identity, leading to soliton solutions via the corresponding Riemann-Hilbert problem. The explicit formulas of these soliton solutions enable a comprehensive exploration of their dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIMS MathematicsSame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207