MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401190546 · doi:10.12927/cjnl.2024.27358

Enhancing Culturally Appropriate Care: The Role of Nurse Leaders

2024· article· en· W4401190546 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sarah Kostiuk, Terri Belcourt, Jade Anderson, Jade Delisle

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing leadership · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Competency in Health Care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatchewan HealthCollege & Association of Registered Nurses of AlbertaSaskatchewan PolytechnicUniversity of ReginaRegistered Nurses' Association of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingPsychologyCultural competenceMedicinePedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although culturally appropriate care is vital to quality of care, many barriers exist to implementing culturally appropriate care in practice. Nurse leaders are in a position where they can act toward addressing some of the barriers and engage nursing staff in strategies to promote the implementation of culturally appropriate care practices on a unit. This article is an opinion piece wherein the authors illustrate leadership strategies that advocate for and nurture a practice where nursing staff are supported to apply their culturally appropriate skills in practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing leadershipSame topicCultural Competency in Health CareFrench-language works237,207