MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401190564 · doi:10.12927/cjnl.2024.27359

Inspiring Nurse Leaders: Optimizing the Working Lives of Nurses in Canada

2024· article· en· W4401190564 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Leigh Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing leadership · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingPsychologyNurse AdministratorMEDLINEMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leigh Chapman was appointed as Canada's chief nursing officer in August 2022. One of her main priorities was to engage with nurses from across Canada. She heard from nurses about the complexity and the multi-faceted nature of health workforce challenges requiring innovative, comprehensive mitigation strategies. Information garnered from her engagement prompted the development of the "Nursing Retention Toolkit: Improving the Working Lives of Nurses in Canada" (Government of Canada 2024), which provides a framework that can be utilized by employers and organizations to enhance the working conditions of nurses. Canadian nurse leaders play a critical role in the implementation of the toolkit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0290.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.275
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing leadershipSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207