Circulating non-coding RNA in type 1 diabetes mellitus as a source of potential biomarkers – An emerging role of sex difference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), such as microRNA, long non-coding RNA, and circular RNA, are considered essential regulatory molecules mediating many cellular processes. Moreover, an increasing number of studies have investigated the role of ncRNAs in cancers and various metabolic disorders, including diabetes mellitus. Interestingly, some circulating ncRNA detected in body fluids may serve as novel biomarkers. There is still a lack of conventional biomarkers that detect the early stage of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Many circulating microRNA, long non-coding RNA, and circular RNA show aberrant expression in type 1 diabetes patients compared to healthy individuals. However, most studies have focused on circulating microRNA rather than long non-coding RNA or circular RNA. In addition, a few studies have evaluated sex differences in ncRNA biomarkers. Therefore, this article summarises current knowledge about circulating ncRNAs as potential biomarkers for type 1 diabetes and explores the effects of sex on such biomarkers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".