MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401198477 · doi:10.1136/bjo-2023-323747

Characterising the refractive error in paediatric patients with congenital stationary night blindness: a multicentre study

2024· article· en· W4401198477 on OpenAlexafffund
Austin D. Igelman, Elizabeth White, Alaa Tayyib, Lesley Everett, Ajoy Vincent, Elise Héon, Christina Zeitz, Michel Michaelides, Omar A. Mahroo, Mohamed Katta, Andrew R. Webster, Markus N. Preising, Birgit Lorenz, Samer Khateb, Eyal Banin, Dror Sharon, Shahar Luski, Filip Van den Broeck, Bart P. Leroy, Sophie Walraedt, Katarína Štingl, Laura Kuehlewein, Susanne Kohl, Milda Reith, Anne B. Fulton, Aparna Raghuram, Isabelle Meunier, Hélène Dollfus, Tomás S. Alemán, Emma Bedoukian, Erin O'Neil, Emily Krauss, Andrea L. Vincent, Charlotte Jordan, Alessandro Iannaccone, Parveen Sen, Srilekha Sundaramurthy, Soumittra Nagasamy, Irina Balikova, Ingele Casteels, Shyamanga Borooah, Shaden H. Yassin, Aaron Nagiel, Hillary Schwartz, Xavier Zanlonghi, Irène Gottlob, Rebecca J. McLean, Francis L. Munier, Andrew Stephenson, Robert A. Sisk, Robert K. Koenekoop, Lorri B. Wilson, Douglas R. Fredrick, Dongseok Choi, Paul Yang, Mark E. Pennesi

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Ophthalmology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentRetina FranceNational Institutes of HealthMinistry of Health, State of IsraelFoundation Fighting BlindnessNational Eye InstituteWellcome TrustIsrael Science FoundationResearch to Prevent Blindness
KeywordsMedicineOphthalmologyRefractive errorPediatricsEye diseaseOptometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Aaims Congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) is an inherited retinal disease that is often associated with high myopia and can be caused by pathological variants in multiple genes, most commonly CACNA1F , NYX and TRPM1 . High myopia is associated with retinal degeneration and increased risk for retinal detachment. Slowing the progression of myopia in patients with CSNB would likely be beneficial in reducing risk, but before interventions can be considered, it is important to understand the natural history of myopic progression. Methods This multicentre, retrospective study explored CSNB caused by variants in CACNA1F , NYX or TRPM1 in patients who had at least 6 measurements of their spherical equivalent of refraction (SER) before the age of 18. A mixed-effect model was used to predict progression of SER overtime and differences between genotypes were evaluated. Results 78 individuals were included in this study. All genotypes showed a significant myopic predicted SER at birth (−3.076D, −5.511D and −5.386D) for CACNA1F , NYX and TRPM1 respectively. Additionally, significant progression of myopia per year (−0.254D, −0.257D and −0.326D) was observed for all three genotypes CACNA1F , NYX and TRPM1 , respectively. Conclusions Patients with CSNB tend to be myopic from an early age and progress to become more myopic with age. Patients may benefit from long-term myopia slowing treatment in the future and further studies are indicated. Additionally, CSNB should be considered in the differential diagnosis for early-onset myopia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of OphthalmologySame topicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesFrench-language works237,207